Proposals (reviewers’ comments)
The writing and clarity are quite thorough.
...study aims/objectives are clearly stated...
...preliminary data are presented well...
...summarized very well the mechanism of action, animal models, and clinical studies...
...the design is presented in a clear manner...
...very well-written and complete application...
...meticulously detailed...
...extensive Figures and Tables...
...objectives are clearly stated...
...rationale for the objectives are detailed...
...hypotheses and purpose clearly stated...
...very few weaknesses in this application...
...well written...very sound scientific rationale...
...The writing and presentation of the project are clear and easy to follow...
Manuscripts (referees’ comments)
This is an excellent and concise review of the current landscape of pre-clinical and clinical trials...very well written...
...a comprehensive treatise...
...nicely summarizes...
...very interesting section...
...very complete review...
...well-referenced...
...quite up-to-date...
...interesting and comprehensive review...
...the writing is clear...
...the manuscript is very informative.